The Uncomfortable Truths Psychology Can No Longer Ignore.🎙️ New Podcast Episode:

Dr Shungu Hilda M’gadzah
Sep 20, 2025
4 min read

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6pbCwKJ4SKk

Summary

We often picture psychology as a force for healing and understanding. But behind the image of objectivity lies a more uncomfortable truth: the field was shaped by racism, silence, and complicity.

In this episode, Beyond the Therapist’s Couch, I explore four truths psychology must confront:

1️⃣ Its Founders Weren’t Heroes – Many were eugenicists who embedded racism into the profession’s foundations.

2️⃣ Neutrality as Harm – Hiding behind “objectivity” allows silence and complacency in the face of injustice.

3️⃣ The ‘Nice Professional’ Problem – When psychologists avoid rocking the boat, they collude with systems of exclusion.

4️⃣ Healing Requires Justice – True well-being demands we address systemic inequities, not just teach individuals to cope.

Psychology cannot afford to ignore these truths any longer. Reckoning with its past—and present—isn’t just about reflection. It’s about revolution.

🔗 What do you think? Can psychology truly decolonise itself, or is a deeper transformation required?

Full Blog

The Uncomfortable Truths Psychology Can No Longer Ignore

Introduction: Beyond the Therapist's Couch

We tend to see psychology as a modern, benevolent force—a discipline dedicated to healing trauma, fostering understanding, and helping people lead better lives. This benevolent image, however, masks a history of scientific racism and a set of systemic problems that the profession is only now beginning to confront.

For over a century, the field of psychology has leveraged a carefully constructed myth of scientific objectivity to conceal a foundational truth: its core principles were not only shaped by racist ideologies but continue to provide institutional cover for systemic harm. This article explores four of these truths, revealing a pattern that stretches from the profession’s origins directly into its present-day practices.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Its Founders Weren't Heroes; Some Were Eugenicists

The origins of modern psychology were not neutral; the discipline was deeply invested in using the tools of science to prove white superiority. Crucially, the proponents of these ideas were not fringe figures; they were the architects of the profession, and their institutional power allowed them to codify their racism as scientific fact.

Granville Stanley Hall, the first president of the American Psychological Association (APA), advanced the idea that Africans and other non-white peoples were "adolescent races" stuck in a stage of "incomplete growth." Meanwhile, Lewis Madison Terman, the developer of the hugely influential Stanford-Binet IQ test, was a prominent eugenicist who used his work to argue for racial segregation. The psychological establishment widely accepted these biased conclusions, weaving scientific racism into the core of its theory and practice. Terman’s own words reveal the chilling certainty with which these beliefs were held:

"Their dullness seems to be racial... Children of this group should be segregated in special classes and be given instruction which is concrete and practical…they cannot master abstractions." — Lewis Madison Terman

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. The Myth of Neutrality Is a Tool for Harm

Having established its authority on a foundation of racial hierarchy, the field's next move was to cloak its biases in the language of neutrality—a tactic that proved just as damaging. For decades, psychology has hidden behind the rhetoric of "science" and "evidence-based" practice to avoid confronting systemic racism. This professional stance creates the illusion of objectivity, but in reality, it allows the profession to remain silent on critical issues of social justice.

This so-called neutrality gives psychologists the ability to "pick and choose" whether to engage with racism, which often translates into inaction. But silence in the face of injustice is never neutral. As psychologist Dr. Shungu Hilda M’gadzah notes, "complacency and complicity sit in the shadow of silence." This failure to speak up becomes a form of betrayal that leaves people experiencing discrimination feeling isolated and alone.

"Too often psychology has hidden behind “science” and “evidence-based” rhetoric while failing to confront systemic racism." — Dr. Shungu Hilda M'gadzah

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3. The "Nice Professional" Can Be Part of the Problem

The abstract harm of professional silence becomes devastatingly concrete in the daily work of individual practitioners. Dr. M’gadzah identifies this phenomenon as the "nice professionals problem," a modern manifestation of the field’s long-standing refusal to confront its own role in upholding racial inequity.

This is particularly evident among Educational Psychologists (EPs), who, in an effort to be seen as friendly and cooperative, may remain silent when they witness racist or discriminatory practices in schools. This desire to be a "nice professional" and "not rock the boat" becomes a form of collusion. The professional, intentionally or not, becomes one of the "systemic cogs that enable and mask exclusion." The cost of this professional comfort is paid by the children who are failed by the very systems meant to support them.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

4. Healing Isn't Just About Coping; It's About Justice

When individual practitioners become systemic cogs, it exposes the limits of a psychology focused on individual coping. This failure is the primary driver behind a growing movement to decolonize the field—an approach that serves as the direct antidote to the founders' racism, the myth of neutrality, and the collusion of the "nice professional."

To "decolonize psychology" is to move beyond simply helping individuals "cope" with inequitable systems and instead pay attention to how a person's "social, political, economic environment and systems affect their mental health." This means psychological practice must honor a person's identity, culture, heritage, and history. It reframes healing not just as an internal process but as a collective pursuit of a more equitable world. As psychologist Dr. Thema Bryant explains, true well-being is inseparable from social change.

"Justice is therapeutic. Justice is healing. Not just taking deep breaths, not just journaling, but if we can shift some social systems it would help a lot of us feel a lot better." — Dr. Thema Bryant

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Conclusion: A Reckoning and a Revolution

Psychology is not merely reckoning with a flawed past; it is being forced to confront a present where its foundational tools and professional norms still perpetuate harm. The slow dismantling of its myths—of heroic founders and objective neutrality—is not an academic exercise. It is a revolution, driven by practitioners who understand that for psychology to heal, it must first be just.

The question, then, is not only for the profession, but for all of us: what will we demand of a field that holds so much power over our minds and our society?

#Psychology #AntiRacism #DecolonisingPsychology #Equity #Inclusion #sixstagesframework. #PodcastLaunch #NewPodcast #ListenNow